TodayPK.video
Download Your Favorite Videos & Music From Youtube
VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
4.9
star
1.68M reviews
100M+
Downloads
10+
Rated for 10+question
Download
VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
Install
logo
VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
Download

Vampires: Los Muertos (2002)

GENRESAction,Horror,Thriller
LANGEnglish
ACTOR
Jon Bon JoviCristián de la FuenteNatasha Gregson WagnerArly Jover
DIRECTOR
Tommy Lee Wallace

SYNOPSICS

Vampires: Los Muertos (2002) is a English movie. Tommy Lee Wallace has directed this movie. Jon Bon Jovi,Cristián de la Fuente,Natasha Gregson Wagner,Arly Jover are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2002. Vampires: Los Muertos (2002) is considered one of the best Action,Horror,Thriller movie in India and around the world.

In Mexico, another vampire slayer, Derek Bliss, is hired by a shady priest and aided by a group of fellow slayers in finding a large nest of 'suckers' and their powerful leader, a vampire princess. She is seeking a legendary black crucifix - the same crucifix used unsuccessfully in the first movie to perform a ritual which will enable vampires to walk in sunlight and be invulnerable.

Vampires: Los Muertos (2002) Reviews

  • Better than I expected for a sequel of this sort.

    Dan-762002-09-30

    I was expecting a poor sequel, similar in nature to the Dusk to Dawn franchise, but I was somewhat surprised. This movie follows the same pattern as the first John Carpenters' Vampires (1998), but features none of the same actors. John Bon Jovi does a quite credible job as the vampire hunter, and Natasha Wagner performs well as the partially infected vampire, rounded out by a resonable supporting cast of hunter assistants, who actually manage to survive the second scene. The problems with this movie mainly come from lack of motivation of several of the characters, particularly Zoey, and strange mistakes made by the villan Arly Jover (from Blade), who up until the final was quite intelligent and managed to fool the hunters at every point. And a general lack of energy from the cast. If you liked the first one you will like this as well. Well worth a rental for anyone who likes the vampire genre.

  • Likeable trash

    uds32003-10-09

    Gotta take my hat off to Carpenter....putting his name up as exec producer here. Gives new meaning to the term low budget! Little more than a juvenile re-make of the original. Vampire Hunter (Jon Bon Jovial), girl who has been bit but not turned....Priest-for-a-partner, snatch of the old "locked into the vampire's wavelength" nonsense and a few sporadically exploding vampires that wouldn't look out of place on Guy Fawkes night! But man...have a look at the hack editing, the childish and garish colors everywhere (MUST have been made ostensibly for the Mexican video market)the totally awesomely vapid acting....its a classic! For some indefinable reason though, the film takes itself soo seriously its almost enchanting. In the upshot, about as frightening as Sesame Street, as intelligent as Mike Tyson and as relevant as a 1972 typewriter! The one decent scene...the two girls about to KISS and they wimp out!

  • Bloodsucking By Numbers

    Leigh L.2003-01-13

    Let's look at the facts here. Straight-to-video. Lower budget. Different director. Cast of nobodies. James Woods: no. Jon Bon Jovi: yes. You're probably not expecting much. Frankly, it's just as well. Despite some moody establishing shots, one or two genuinely classy action moments and the odd tenuous attempt to link this film to its predecessor, the whole thing is hamstrung by a total lack of ambition, dismal script and some of the worst acting I've seen in years. It's a poor man's retread of the original on a far more modest scale, and in sequel terms about as necessary as Highlander II. And... you know... Jon Bon Jovi. What were they thinking? At least his character was called 'Derek'.

  • Better than I had expected, especially since the star was JBJ

    oxfordzoo2002-07-20

    The original Vampires (1998) is one of my favorites. I was curious to see how a sequel would work considering they used none of the original characters. I was quite surprised at how this played out. As a rule, sequels are never as good as the original, with a few exceptions. Though this one was not a great movie, the writer did well in keeping the main themes & vampire lore from the first one in tact. Jon Bon Jovi was a drawback initially, but he proved to be a half-way decent Slayer. I doubt anyone could top James Wood's performance in the first one, though... unless you bring in Buffy! All in all, this was a decent watch & I would watch it again. I was left with two questions, though... what happened to Jack Crow & how did Derek Bliss come to be a slayer? Guess we'll just have to leave that to imagination.

  • Wanted : Undead or Alive - Mostly Dead Though

    boo_4ever2005-02-22

    Before I go on I have to admit to being a huge Bon Jovi fan. In fact thats what attracted me to the DVD case in the first place. I probably would have bought it anyway being such a big horror fan and having enjoyed the first Vampires title so much. But this isn't half as good. Not even Jon could save this film for me. My main problem would be that it simply isn't scary. Apart from Jon's character Derek Bliss none of the other characters make an impression and you couldn't care less whether they die or not, especially the annoying vampire / drug addict woman. The female vampire simply isn't scary or sexy. Rather she looks like an anorexic 14 year girl, no wonder she is so desperate for blood then. Another huge problem is that everything is just "too bright". There is no atmosphere or sense of dread. I know the first Vampires being set in New Mexico wasn't exactly the twilight zone in terms of creepiness but yet it still managed to be dark and foreboding when it needed to be. This film has no tension like that. The story is basically the same as before. Vampire wants Berzier's cross to be able to walk in daylight. However the story has less cool bits this time. There is no wow factor in knowing this is the master of all master - the original vampire, as in the first film. You really don't care who or what this one is. There is no army of masters. Instead she hides out in some old ruin which looks more like a Disneyland attraction then a creepy temple. So there you have it really. Lack of scares, lack of atmosphere, lack of interesting story. A real let down for me personally.

Hot Search